Saturday, May 3, 2008

Is Oil Becoming the “Mother of All Bubbles?”

Most of the world's major oil deposits have already been discovered. The low-hanging fruit has been picked. The remaining oil supplies are tough to get at – and expensive to recover.

Meanwhile, the world's demand for oil keeps rising as more people around the globe – especially in emerging giants like India and China – set up factories, buy cars, take flights, heat their homes, and pound the table for "more juice."

Then there are political question marks. Iraq is a mess. Russia is inclined to use its resource exports as a carrot or a stick, depending on the mood. And Nigeria is a special basket case.

Last week, for instance, an escalation in attacks by militants in the Niger Delta sent oil to a record close. Exxon has said the situation is so bad that its production is now closed and it is unable to meet its contractual obligations.

Royal Dutch and other Western oil companies there have the same problem. Not good. Nigeria is Africa's largest producer and the world's eleventh biggest.

No wonder oil is trading near $120 a barrel.

This is the back story. But it's important to understand that it is only that, a story. It doesn't tell us where oil should be trading. Ultimately, that will be decided by supply and demand, not by this week's headlines or short-term speculation.

A lot of smart people are beginning to believe this bull market will die hard. Whether you agree or not, it's worth listening to their side.

According to Michael Lynch, President of Strategic Energy & Economic
Research, oil has now become "the mother of all bubbles." He has a few pertinent facts on his side.

The U.S. is the world's largest oil consumer. Yet our economy is in a slump. Despite the sharp rise in oil prices this year, oil demand in the U.S. is actually down 2% so far.

According to the federal Energy Information Administration, high prices and a weak economy will knock down U.S. oil consumption by 90,000 barrels a day this year.

The situation is similar in many other parts of the world. The International Energy Agency (IEA), the Paris-based energy watchdog of the world's richest nations, just lowered its forecast for world oil demand growth by 460,000 barrels a day. The IEA also sees supply from outside OPEC growing by 815,000 barrels a day, the strongest growth since 2004.

According to Mr. Lynch, "The run-up in price we're seeing in the last six weeks or so has happened while the fundamentals have, generally speaking, gotten bearish."

Tim Evans, an energy analyst at Citigroup in New York, agrees. He says the oil bubble is "still expanding" and insists "there is no supply-demand" deficit.

So far the futures market has shrugged off these arguments. Oil is up roughly 25% this year and prices have almost doubled since the start of 2007.

And who can say? Maybe oil will trend higher. Perhaps much higher, especially if we see a major supply disruption.

But high prices always sow the seeds of their own collapse. Consumers will start to conserve. Producers will search for oil that was once too costly to extract. Supply and demand will come back into balance.

Right now the bulls are having their way. But it would be foolish to believe there are no red flags on the horizon. Chief among these is that you keep hearing "the story."

You know the stories. "The internet changes everything." "They're not making any more real estate." "Oil has nowhere to go but up."

We'll see.


Unknown said...

I truly think oil has seen it's day, and that we have reached "peak" oil in more ways than just the supply side. People are beginning to resent the stuff. Though we love our cars, I suspect that oil will be displaced by a multitude of other technology. First will be natural gas, which I bet that there is 10x undiscovered quantities of. Then nuclear will suddenly become vogue once the waste problem is taken care of.

Don't forget, that burning wood for industrial purposes was the fashion until coal became mainstream. At one time, there must have been "peak wood." So, it's just a matter of further technology developement, that has been hindered by the easy access to oil. This will change once gasoline goes up to ten dollars a gallon.

Anonymous said...

You don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about.

Anonymous said...

To be fair, he does have a slight idea. Peak wood wouldn't make sense if defined the same way as peak oil--peak oil is based off the belief that there's a finite amount of oil in the ground, and that sometime (soon) we'll be consuming more than we produce. When that happens: Shit-->fan. Wood, on the other hand, wouldn't have ran out back in the day. It was remarkably inefficient however, which is why we switched to coal, and later oil, etc.

But also to say that we'll just switch to nuclear is a little unrealistic. The number of nuclear plants to make up for oil--I forget the number, but it's HUGE. And alternative energy? Tar flats? Etc? They don't match up, either.

Anonymous said...

There are some good points here. One worth adding is that a lot of the price increase is due to speculative demand, i.e. people buying oil futures in the hope of rising prices. It also seen as an alternative to the dollar. However, some in OPEC talk of a $200 barrel. Maybe that is just what they are hoping for...


Gareth said...

Electro, I laughed out loud at the comment about 'peak wood', do you understand why peak even exists as a concept? Its because oil is a finite resource, it doesnt keep being made. Trees on the other hand keep growing...

Lets not forget in all this discussion the VAST deposits of oil in Canadian shale sands, quite possibly even larger than the Arabian oil fields.

Anonymous said...

And you do? One wouldn't gather it from your cowardly, one-sentence, anonymous post!

Put up, or shut up.

Anonymous said...

I'm worried about peak porn